Tags:
Permalink Reply by Eric Rohloff on January 3, 2011 at 10:00pm
Permalink Reply by snewman7118 on January 3, 2011 at 11:17pm
Permalink Reply by Bob West on January 4, 2011 at 9:39am
Permalink Reply by Bob West on January 5, 2011 at 8:47am
Permalink Reply by Hap Hollibaugh on January 16, 2011 at 10:19pm
Permalink Reply by Michael Dunlavey on January 18, 2011 at 1:25pm Being I'm a Perlite expander the Rice Hull issue has been ongoing for several years now and well discussed. There is some good information on the Perlite Institute website for our view on the subject.
Here is a link to one specific article- http://www.perlite.org/perlite_info/guides/plants/RICE%20HULLS%20VS...
Permalink Reply by Eric Rohloff on January 18, 2011 at 2:03pm
Permalink Reply by Mark Shepherd on January 24, 2011 at 1:32pm The Perlite Institute's claims (dated April 1, 2007) by CL Bethke- do not match University research by Dr. Michael Evans -University of Arkansas. Dr. Evans does not work for the Institute, nor the manufacturers who are marketing PBH. Parboiled fresh rice hulls. The only thing agreeable in the entire Perlite Institute article, is that when you make a change to your media-no matter what that change may be- you better be willing to adjust and adapt. PBH has NEVER been marketed to replace vermiculite. PBH does a great job replacing perlite. It has been working very well for growers since 2005.And the mice situation is all about management as well. So the mice showed up when the rice hulls arrived? - rice hulls are a natural by product of grain. Accept that, and make plans if you have mice in your area. Or just stick with high priced, dusty perlite and stop bashing new sustainable ideas. We wonder why this industry gets stuck in a cycle of high price components and low margins on plant material. Be proactive, not pessimistic-some growers just aren't willing to adapt to change. Sustainable initiatives are here to stay. PBH is a proven product, call me anytime u want to discuss.
Permalink Reply by Roger Esbenshade on January 24, 2011 at 2:00pm
Permalink Reply by Eric Rohloff on January 24, 2011 at 2:33pm So the mice showed up when the rice hulls arrived? - rice hulls are a natural by product of grain. Accept that, and make plans if you have mice in your area. Or just stick with high priced, dusty perlite and stop bashing new sustainable ideas. We wonder why this industry gets stuck in a cycle of high price components and low margins on plant material. Be proactive, not pessimistic-some growers just aren't willing to adapt to change. Sustainable initiatives are here to stay.
Permalink Reply by Mark Shepherd on January 24, 2011 at 3:07pm Who's doing the bashing? I only spoke of my experiences and the experiences of other growers in are area. I never said they wouldn't work. Why do I have to adapt to change? The mice problem was way beyond anything you could imagine. So If I use rice hulls you want me to be proactive and throw mice poison everywhere? That sounds sustainable. My proactive approach is to not use them. I did try them as we are always looking for alternative media components. The rice hulls are working great for some growers. They just don't fit us. If you want to bash anybody get on the growers that are still putting foam beads in their mix.
Mark Shepherd said:So the mice showed up when the rice hulls arrived? - rice hulls are a natural by product of grain. Accept that, and make plans if you have mice in your area. Or just stick with high priced, dusty perlite and stop bashing new sustainable ideas. We wonder why this industry gets stuck in a cycle of high price components and low margins on plant material. Be proactive, not pessimistic-some growers just aren't willing to adapt to change. Sustainable initiatives are here to stay.
© 2013 Created by Sara Tambascio.